There is a reason for this. Languages developed for the purpose of communicating with other people. Language was created in order to communicate with people, it was not created to express truth. And it is unlikely that any of the people who created language had known truth. This is why there is no word for the ultimate truth. And the people who knew truth did not know it through language, they knew it through silence. This means that when they experienced truth they were totally silent, no word existed there. So there is a problem: when they started talking about it after the experience, they found one point, truth, which there was no way to describe. It is not possible to provide words for it. And when they provided words, the words were incomplete, they fell short.
And on the basis of these words alone, conflicts arose – based on these very same words! Because all words are inadequate, they are unable to express truth. They are just like hints. It is as if somebody is pointing his finger to the moon, and if we grab his finger thinking that this is the moon, then there will be trouble. The finger is not the moon. The finger is just an indication. Whoever grabs hold of the indication will be in trouble. You have to let go of the finger so that the thing to which it is pointing becomes visible. You have to drop the words, and only then will you have a glimpse of truth. But someone who grabs hold of the words will miss the experience.
This is why there is no way for me to tell you what truth is. And if somebody claims to be telling you, he is deceiving himself. If somebody tells you this, he is deceiving himself and you. There is no way to describe truth. Yes, there is a way to tell you how to experience truth. The method to know truth, the process, can be described, but what truth is cannot be said.
There are methods to attain truth, but there are no definitions of truth. During these three days I have discussed these methods, and you may feel that we have completely ignored truth itself. I have talked about truth, but I have never said what truth actually is.
No, it cannot be said, it can only be experienced. Truth cannot be described but it can be experienced – and it will be your experience. The method can be given, but the experience of truth will be your own. The experience of truth is always individual, and it is not possible to communicate it to another.
So this is why I will not tell you what truth is. It is not because I want to withhold something from you, but because it cannot be said. In ages past, during the time of the Upanishads, whenever it happened that someone would go to a sage and ask, “What is truth?” the sage would look hard at the person.
Again the person would ask, “What is truth?” Then he would ask a third time, “What is truth?”
And the sage would say, “I tell you again and again, but you don’t understand.”
The person would say, “What are you saying? I have asked you three times, and all three times you were silent. And you say that you have told me again and again?”
Then the sage would say, “I wish you were able to understand my silence, because then you will have understood what truth is.”
Silence is the only way to say it. Those who have known truth have become silent. When truth is talked about, they become silent.
If you can be silent, you can know it. If you are not silent you will not be able to know it. You can know the truth, but you cannot make another person know it. This is why I won’t say what truth is – because it cannot be said.